Jim Killock analyses the Privacy and Security report from the UK's Intelligence and Security Committee
The mammoth Privacy and Security report from the UK's Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) is an object lesson in how the establishment works. Faced with overwhelming evidence of a vast extension of surveillance powers, it’s a call for rationalised laws and greater explanation of what GCHO is doing.
It’s a remarkable report. The ISC might never admit it, but the report owes its existence to Edward Snowden. Faced with detailed information about precisely what GCHO is doing, the ISC has been forced to respond with its own description, including a lot of reassuring words that explain that its work is necessary, proportionate and lawful, in between, it makes some startling admissions:firstly, that 'bulk personal datasets' exist and are largely legally unregulated; and secondly, that the choices of technologies that underlie GCHO’s Internet break-ins lack any democratic oversight.




